There Is No Special Way Works of Art Have to Be

Art or Philosophy

Reduced to the few dates in which information technology is customary to sum up a career, the intellectual and bookish trajectory of Arthur Danto (1924-2013) seems thoroughly linear. Born in Michigan, Danto grew up in Detroit where he began studies in art, art history and philosophy, thank you to the scholarship he obtained subsequently spending two years in the regular army. He completed his studies in the Philosophy Department at Columbia, where he began instruction in 1951 and where he remained until his retirement. This straight line, however, masks a crucial wavering and a decisive pick. For what first led Danto to New York in these late 1940s was less the prestige of Columbia than the aura of the great Abstract Expressionists. Indeed, in parallel with his studies and his later didactics, Danto pursued with some success a promising artistic career. [one] By his own admission, he became a professor because he felt this would let him time to piece of work on his art. After trying his hand at painting, he devoted himself primarily to woodblock printing. His woodcuts were strongly influenced by German Expressionism, which he had had the opportunity to observe in the rich collection of the Detroit Institute of Arts. They were besides driven by the vitality of feeling, the concern for sincerity, and the gestural energy that, from Franz Kline to De Kooning, characterized the New York School, and then dominant on an American artistic landscape that was commencement to think of itself as the center of the world for the commencement time in its history.

Yet gradually in the early on 1960s, Danto came to sense that this type of art, which was geared towards the expression of life, was coming to an terminate. While in France for a breather year, he discovered in the columns of ARTnews a reproduction of "The Osculation" past Roy Lichtenstein. To discover in a highly respectable art magazine an image that looked similar it was taken from a comic book seemed crazy to him—as crazy, he said, every bit if he had learned from the newspaper that a horse had been made bishop. At start, this postcard from New York left him skeptical; rejection and then gave way to dubiousness and, finally, to the certainty that something unprecedented was actually happening. Thus, the question opened upwardly by Pop Art (simply what, then, is art if this tin can be art?), which would become primal to his philosophical work, was commencement lived, in biographical terms, as the intimate experience of asynchrony and of the irreversibility of historical time.

Although Danto never presented it as such, one can read his attachment to Henry James' short story "The Madonna of the Future" (1873)—an attachment so strong that he non only cited the story extensively, simply also used its title for i of his most famous works—as the memory of that experience and the endeavour to requite shape to the quandary. Similar the hero of the short story, who believed he could reconnect with Raphael while the nineteenth century was in the process of inventing kitsch, Danto suddenly discovered he was an outdated artist who believed in gesture, depth and feeling, at a time when Popular was literally dissolving these in its ironic acrid bath. But while James'southward character intended to chart his own temporal path and sank into madness and the impotence of his belief in the eternity of art, Danto the artist gradually lost his taste for his own work as he came to this realization. It seemed quite clear to him that the fine art that interested him as an creative person was outmoded, and that he was not especially gifted for the one whose newfound freedom enthused him every bit a philosopher and a connoisseur. Thus, he had to choose between remaining an artist of the 1950s and becoming a philosopher of the 1960s. Determined to board the train of history, Danto put away his tools and woodcuts in a closet.

Nevertheless, choosing philosophy equally Danto did was then another way of choosing art, of giving oneself the possibility to be in tune with the artistic times, and of entering what he would soon phone call "the artworld" by playing the role of a theorist rather than that of a practitioner. Danto became a full-fledged philosopher, which is to say, a full-time philosopher who was to mark the history of philosophy by seizing an object—art—that until then had not been role of his theoretical concerns in any way. Indeed, the notions of gustatory modality and artful pleasance, which were central to the philosophy of art at the time, had kept him away from that field, for they already seemed to him dusty and inadequate every bit regards the Abstruse Expressionism that had fostered his own vocation equally an artist.

This option of philosophy was definitively confirmed by his visit, in the spring of 1964, to the Warhol exhibition at the Stable Gallery. This truly primitive scene, to which Danto returned in virtually all of his books, gave his subsequent work its central motif: the indiscernibles, embodied by the famous "Brillo Boxes," which are not the simple real Brillo boxes found on supermarket shelves fifty-fifty though they deceptively look similar them. What makes an artwork an artwork? What is art? Such was the question with which Danto became a philosopher—the question he kept on asking, from his seminal article, "The Artworld," [2] to his final book published the twelvemonth of his death and also entitled What Art Is. [3]

Andy Warhol, Brillo Box, 1964

Freedom Summer

The paradox of this question is that while information technology was fabricated fully contemporary past Pop Art, information technology simultaneously appeared, in its somewhat naive Platonism, as philosophically obsolete. Danto's originality consisted in wanting to revive the topicality and acuteness of the question of the essence of art, in a hostile philosophical climate dominated past the post-Wittgensteinian idea that art is an "open up" concept—i.e., that it is neither possible nor in fact really interesting to define it. [4] Thus, from a philosophical perspective, Danto's project ran against the tide, at least in the field of American analytical philosophy in which he was trained and commencement became known. In parallel, Danto strove to embrace the present of art. Hence there was no question for him of ignoring the upheavals that had marked the history of fine art since Impressionism. For it was they that had inspired his thinking by constantly pushing the limits of the concept of fine art, and considering the latest such upheaval, which he ultimately regarded as the last in the absolute of a completed history, had afflicted his own artistic do to the point of depriving it of its meaning.

The theoretical challenge Danto took upwardly was thus to endeavour to link his principled essentialism (there is something that makes an artwork an artwork, a gear up of criteria that help to distinguish an artwork from other types of objects that are non art) with the historicism that was nevertheless constantly—and already fairly conventionally at the time—presented equally an objection to information technology (the historical fluctuation of the criteria for defining artworks beingness interpreted as the mark of their inessentiality, there could be no "eternal" definition of art). He therefore strove to integrate the historical dimension of fine art into his definition, just without making the latter purely extrinsic.

Danto laid the background for his thesis in the article that made him famous in 1964, "The Artworld." A few lines repeatedly taken up ever since control attention: "To see something as art requires something the eye cannot decry—an atmosphere of artistic theory, a knowledge of the history of art: an artworld." [5] There is, in other words, first of all a "seeing-every bit" that confers on an artwork its status as artwork and that is admittedly irreducible to sensuous seeing. Art is non primarily a thing of sensation—thus Danto butterfingers "aesthetics" understood in its etymological sense and took annotation of the untying of art from beauty. Positively formulated, this assertion construes theory every bit that which forms an artwork in both senses of the term: Theory ensures that the artwork can be seen as an artwork, and constitutes its very nature, its essence, even earlier information technology is accepted as such. Hence the second idea that the artworld (i.e., the world of artworks) is a region ontologically singled-out from the real world of ordinary experience, though of course it tin can physically or perceptually overlap with it.

When years subsequently Danto returned to this text, he strongly emphasized its publication date: 1964 was non just the year of the exhibition of the "Brillo Boxes" but also that of the "Freedom Summer," which marked a decisive moment in the struggle for civil rights. Danto saw in the Warhol event an echo of the political and social emancipatory electric current then running through the United States. Popular Art gave objects a legitimacy they had previously been denied; information technology freed art from the last limits that were imposed on it. One might add together that Danto the philosopher as well freed himself from a certain belittling aesthetics past presenting himself as an essentialist, and by affirming the possibility of a historically informed return to the Platonist "What is..."

The success of "The Artworld" was nevertheless ambiguous, for the commodity became famous thanks to the interpretation George Dickie made of information technology, and on the basis of which he adult the institutional theory of art. [half-dozen] This theory primarily holds that, more than being a reality, an artwork is a status granted or denied to certain objects by the actors of an "artworld" that is divers in a purely institutional manner (i.east., as composed of artists, but also critics, curators, gallery owners, etc.). Withal Danto e'er distanced himself from this position, which he looked upon equally a sociologizing relativism that was not only insufficient, but also contrary to the very spirit of his essentialist projection.

The Closure of Essence and the Pale of History

As office of this projection, Danto had to work on two fundamental fronts. Offset, and this was the primary purpose of The Transfiguration of the Commonplace, [7] he needed to ontologically complete his thesis in society to avoid any misunderstanding: He had to analyze that which art is in itself and which justifies that the status of artwork does non stem merely from the pure and capricious decree pronounced by actors socially entitled to do so. Thus, Danto defined the artwork by its aboutness, by its capacity to be "about"—that is to say, its intentionality, which distinguishes it from the commonplace objects with which it can sometimes be physically confused. For case, an artwork consisting of a blank canvas may lack content, but this lack is itself a content: It is nearly zero, or almost aboutness. By dissimilarity, a bare canvas in a studio or in a store is not, and cannot be, almost anything at all. As the title The Transfiguration of the Commonplace itself suggests, art "transfigures" the object information technology seizes by making information technology an "embodied meaning." To support his chief intuition of the invisible duality of withal incommensurable worlds—the real earth and the artworld—Danto extended the metaphor of Christian transubstantiation. For Danto, who was raised in a not-practicing Reform Jewish family and whose male parent was a Freemason, in that location was something intellectually fascinating and utterly exotic about Christian theological tools. He was nevertheless reproached for using such linguistic communication, notably past Richard Shusterman, who saw in the latter, beyond the pure analogical game, the symptom of a renewed religious alienation. In reality, claimed Shusterman, the separation of art from life, the invisible "gap" on which Danto insisted so much neutralizes art by making it harmless, and tears life apart from itself as it does so. [8] This is especially true given that Danto's emphasis on theory and estimation disqualified the very notion of artful experience, which was crucial to the pragmatist tradition Shusterman belongs to. Yet against the critiques sometimes leveled at Danto's intellectualism, it should be emphasized that the artwork divers every bit embodied pregnant cannot practice without its own body, however immaterial, and hence cannot be but replaced by its interpretation—an interpretation that the artwork certainly calls for, but that it resists in the aforementioned moment.

Second, in order to present his definition of art as the transhistorical definition of its essence, and not as a historically determined and hence dated definition, Danto likewise needed to develop a philosophy of history (of art)—a task he tackled in The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. He had to account for the definitive—because unsurpassable—character of the definition of art reached past Pop Art. He did this by construing the pivotal moment of the 1960s as "the end of art history," by which he meant that, at the end of a teleological progression, art achieved consciousness of its ain essence by agreement itself as philosophy of fine art. [9] While the end of art coincided for Danto with the stop of his career as an creative person, it did not mean its disappearance or expiry. Indeed, the closure of the definition of fine art in terms of comprehension unsaid its opening in terms of extension: The stop of art primarily meant the appearance of pluralism, the impossibility of excluding a priori anything from the field of fine art and of giving a direction to the latter. Every bit a result, it did not simply launch a new era in art history, merely rather, to take up a formula ofttimes used by Danto, it launched a new kind of era—one which lacks stylistic unity, in which the notions of progress or overcoming take lost all relevance, and which cannot be read as one stage in a "grand narrative."

Although Danto did sometimes use the term "postmodern" to characterize art from afterward the terminate of history, he mostly preferred that of "mail-historical," which had the advantage of summing upward his thesis. Indeed, from his perspective, the term "postmodern" contained at least three ambiguities that he wished to avert. First, it could notwithstanding be understood as a "historical" category: While the postmodern, as the word literally suggests, is that which comes after the modern, or modernism—and this whether the "after" is chronological or dialectical—it is also inscribed within a history. 2d, because the term was often used de facto as a stylistic category, its telescopic was besides narrow, equally it could evidently include the artworks of Julian Schnabel, David Salle or Frank Gehry—to take the examples cited by Danto—while ignoring those of Jenny Holzer and Robert Mangold, despite their being both contemporary and thoroughly post-historical. [ten] Finally, postmodernism was not supposed to be the prerogative of fine art, and though Danto was at once a theorist and an advocate of artistic pluralism, he categorically denied existence a postmodern philosopher: Truth remained for him the horizon of philosophy, which substantially distinguished it from art. Consequently, there could exist no postal service-historical phase in philosophy, because "when the truth is found, there is cypher further to do. Nothing could exist more dismal to contemplate than philosophizing without stop, which is an statement that philosophy is not art and that pluralism is a bad philosophy of philosophy." [11] This, at whatsoever rate, was a philosophy incompatible with Danto'southward essentialism.

A Philosophical Style

Thus, little by little, Danto mobilized continental authors who are generally neglected by belittling philosophers: Hegel, who inspired his philosophy of history, Leibniz, from whom he took upwards the question of the indiscernibles, Plato, not only the dialectician but besides the metaphysician concerned with moving from words to Essences, but also Heidegger, Nietzsche, Sartre—authors whom he drew on very freely, if not erroneously with respect to the academic criteria of the history of philosophy. Overall, Danto never intended to be the careful commentator of the texts he quoted, sometimes merely from retention or at least fairly roughly. Similarly, his noesis of art history, which was far from limited to mod and contemporary art, never took the class of antiquarian scholarship. Danto'southward accuracy played out elsewhere than in footnotes.

Danto'south work is characterized by a unique style that is both rigorous in its own logic and especially pleasant, and whose rhetorical resources and strategies are highly inventive. Thanks to the charm and credible simplicity of his writing, which contrasts with the ambition of his philosophical interrogation, his work has attracted readers well beyond specialized philosophical circles—as well every bit vehement detractors. Without ever quite losing his natural language-in-cheek humor, he shone especially in his descriptions and evocations, equally well as in his choice and use of examples, which he borrowed from art history and literature (Henry James, every bit we saw before, just also Borges, Shakespeare, Keats, Joyce, etc.) or sometimes entirely made. Thus, he deployed numerous thought experiments around his question—that of the indiscernibles—which he regarded equally the philosophical question par excellence. While this method was office of an already well-established exercise in the analytical movement, he renewed it in a very personal way, by constructing a multitude of highly imaginative and often agreeable fictitious "pairs" of indiscernibles, which led to sometimes dizzying analyses cheers to an acute sense of assemblage. [12] To mention one example, in The Madonna of the Future, Danto imagined that the time-traveling curator of a hypothetical Museum of Monochromy, which had opened in Cincinnati, discovered in the studio of Theobald, the failed painter of James's curt story, the canvas whose blankness summed upwards the tragic impossibility of his quest afterward years of hard work. In the eyes of the 1973 curator, this canvas appeared not as the obvious failure that it was in 1873, but equally a vivid masterpiece, the starting point of the entire history of the white monochrome. Danto described the scene equally follows:

"Has it a title?" [... the Curator] asks. Theobald replies: "It has been referred to equally 'The Madonna of the Time to come.'" "Bright!" the Curator responds. "What a comment the dust and cracks brand on the hereafter of religion! Information technology belongs in my monograph—it belongs in my museum! Y'all will exist celebrated!" This "Ghost of Art Worlds Hereafter," every bit a curator, volition accept brought some slides—of Malevich, Rodchenko, Rauschenberg, Ryman. The slides are pretty much all alike, and each resembles Theobald's blank sheet about as much equally they resemble one another. Theobald would have no pick just to regard the curator every bit mad. Just if he has a philosophical imagination, he might say this: Information technology does not follow from those blank canvases being artworks, together with the resemblance function between their work and my bare sail, that this blank canvas is an artwork. [13]

Subsequently the Finish of Art

Danto explored other modes of writing every bit he became, from 1984 onwards, an art critic for The Nation—the major "progressive" weekly created at the end of the American Civil War, in the wake of the abolitionist movement.

Once again, albeit in very different terms, he was confronted with the question of his ain position in history. In the early 1960s, Danto was concerned with not staying backside, with not missing the nowadays and the hereafter it foreshadowed. By the mid-1980s, the present had disappeared from this "post-history" he theorized. Danto was sixty years erstwhile and the time of the revolutions, of the avant-garde ferment whose zenith he had known and celebrated, was past by definition. He himself wrote the eulogy that magnified this era, and from so on seemed condemned to spend the rest of his life looking back. By his ain admission, his idea of the end of fine art was too a "response to the dismal land of the artworld" [xiv] in the 1980s, for "when one tin exercise anything, there does not seem any longer much reason to practice one thing rather than another." [15] The time of repetition and pastiche had arrived. After history, can i even be somewhere? Is there whatever sense in trying to remain in touch with the present if it is no longer located in the course of history, understood in the potent sense Danto strove to give to the term? If in that location is no borderland left for artists to transgress, if the truth of the essence of fine art has been unveiled, what remains for the philosopher to call back and to pursue? What happens to heroes after the determination of the novel? Happy people, the proverb goes, accept no history. Danto'southward fear was that, like them, he would be pushed out of the history he had in a sense himself written, and be relegated to what he called "mail-narrational insignificance." [16]

Yet against all expectations, as Danto'southward critical essays multiplied, this anxious melancholy turned into a renewed enthusiasm for liberty conquered and finally recognized. He no longer regarded history as the great engine that assigns tasks and lays downwards challenges, offering everyone the possibility to take part and observe a meaningful place in it. Through assiduously attention fine art in the making, he came to view history as a burden that it is evidently good to exist costless of. Thus, the book Danto devoted in 2009 to Andy Warhol  [17] is curiously dedicated "to Barack and Michelle Obama, and the future of American art." Curiously considering—without mentioning the American-centric naivety that is on brandish here, and that remains, to a large extent, a blind spot in Danto—the merits that art "has no hereafter" was the provocative leitmotif of his very first article almost the terminate of art.

As an art critic, Danto found the opportunity to scrutinize this future that is not one, in the sense that the surprises it has in shop are not historical in nature. Still, he did not refrain from rereading the by, as he seized on the pretext of an exhibition or a retrospective to devote occasionally unexpected texts to canonical figures of art history (Giotto, Chardin, Tintoretto, Manet, etc.). In a higher place all, criticism was a way of testing his major philosophical theses by giving them practical application. In this sense, these essays—hundreds of texts scattered in catalogs and journals, only besides in many cases gathered in volumes [18]—belong in their ain right to his philosophical work: They constitute the latter's physical component that manifests, across the reservations that it might requite rise to, all its fecundity.

On the other hand, Danto'southward theses themselves require a renewed formulation of the role of the critic, whose discourse can no longer beget to be teleological or even "aesthetic"—as was that of Cloudless Greenberg, the great theorist of Abstract Expressionism and formalist Modernism who preceded Danto in the columns of The Nation. Indeed, if history is finished, the critic can no longer judge artworks every bit a pundit or a professor would, in light of the "progress" or "backwardness" to which they might adjure. Danto explicitly refrained from writing "negative" reviews; he only wrote about artists whose work he accounted worthy of interest. Moreover, if the artwork is embodied meaning, and then the critic's essential chore is not to describe the pleasance information technology gives to a refined eye, merely to deploy such pregnant and to account for the mode in which artworks embody what they mean. For instance, Danto strove to show that Lucien Freud makes nakedness, whose coldness and rawness distinguish it from classical nudity, an artistic possibility able to reveal "the bodily unconscious" which lies merely below bare skin—that "surface text writing upon by our lives." [19] For their part, Rauschenberg'due south "Combines," in which old tires, cracked dishes, rusty license plates (all traces of a certain life of the American soul reduced to the figure of the garage) are splattered with pigment drips, embodied in his optics the tension between the earthly globe of commonplace objects and the artworld which can give them a second chance and a new form of existence. [20] Furthermore, following a typically mail-historical structure, Danto considered that the work of Jeff Koons is about the readymade, but that the mode it positions itself across practiced and bad taste also confers on it a moral pregnant. [21] By dissimilarity, Rothko's paintings present a metaphysical truth in purely sensuous terms, "something that has vanished from the visual world, in which called-for bushes are, well, simply burning bushes" [22]: they signify beauty in a strange mode. And pluralism, even though it has decentered beauty and untied it from the essence of art, tin can but make the place for information technology that artists are willing to requite.

Not Andy Warhol

As an chestnut, it appears that Danto kept under the coffee table of his New York flat a gift from Mike Bidlo: "Not Andy Warhol," an "appropriation" of the "Brillo Boxes" [23] that created an additional caste of indiscernibility. Thus, in accordance with his desire as an artist and then as a philosopher, Danto remained a human being of his time; or rather, he never stopped trying to become ane. He was a man who believed, perhaps beyond reason, in the actuality of freedom, and who attempted to love that which dissolves history, while also hoping to exit his mark somewhere—a human who, for this purpose, was sometimes able to look at the present backwards, from the perspective of an imaginary hereafter that transforms it into the past. He was a man who consistently sought to place himself in a vanishing signal, in the imperceptible—and still for him unbridgeable—gap that separates art from life.

wigginscoand1982.blogspot.com

Source: https://booksandideas.net/Arthur-C-Danto-or-the-Duality-of-Worlds.html

Share this post